![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
I was completely surprised by this when i saw it, i never realised they were changing the system (brought about through Tony Blair's Americanisation when he was P.M.), but today the UK has offically opened it's Supreme Court and sworn in it's first 11 judges, rebranding the Law Lords (which is sorta a shame just because i love the title "Law Lord"), and fully seperating the final court of appeal from Parliament, representating a major constitutional change. It also has horrible carpets.
Apart from seperating the court from Parliament (including physically moving it from Westminster Palace to across the road) and taking judiciary judgements away from the House of Lords, it's also making the process more modern and open compared to the previous Lords court, including the building, more public seats and also filming proceedings for broadcast on television etc. Wigs have also been done away with. Then of course, with constitutional change, and a seperation from parliament and the government, some also fear just how far the new supreme court will go and if they could prevent problems etc for the government, and there's always some who dislike the idea of changing the traditional ways. There also seems to be a bit of a devolution mish-mash going on when it comes to how much it's going to affect Scotland in particular, but also Wales and Northern Ireland; it seems for some things the rulings will apply to Scotland but for others it won't. Also, while i know legal independence from parliament is a good thing, but in practice the Law Lords kept themselves seperate from the House of Lords anyway, and it has been described as "a change in form rather than substance"; it's still the same Lords sitting in the court, just under a new guise, bringing about the "if it isn't broken why fix it?" argument to a degree. So any views on the new court? good idea? bad idea? will it affect us much? is it more symbolic than anything else? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8283939.stm Article showing the President of the Supreme Court being sworn in http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8283967.stm Supreme Court Q&A http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8152427.stm Inside the Supreme Court ![]()
__________________
Veni Vidi Defeci Opera, just what the world needs, more fat women screaming. "Last year they pitched camp at the base of Mount Everest and had their servants climb up it while they held a wine tasting."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Birthday
![]() |
the name shouldnt of changed. The wigs should stay. The name is utterly repulsive. I disliked the idea so much when i heard it i refused to read into it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
|
I'll go with good idea, bad implementation.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: January 2nd, 2005
Location: Leeds
Age: 20
Male
|
The omega symbol on that logo thingy is just bloody awful.
The creation of a Supreme Court is a pointless endeavour overall. Even the justices involved admit that barely anything is changing. Blahhhhhhhhhhhhh. [edit] omg I just checked out the carpets and they're beyond absymal. They're like something from a Wacky Warehouse [remember those?].
__________________
Quote:
LEEDS UNITED ♥ Last edited by Ingrate; Oct-01-2009 at 01:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
![]() |
I'm actually really quite upset about this. They should never have made any of these changes. House of Lords sounds brilliant, and Law Lords > any other term.
__________________
Arts and Entertainment
(for srs discussions about Lady Gaga, mostly.) "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor." Fraa Erasmas (Anathem, by Neal Stephenson) FictionPress Account | UP YOUR VIVA! | AO3 Account - a fanfiction archive by fans, for fans. See OTW for more details. God hates figs: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
To me this is just another reason to hate Tony Blair; it's sad to see a unique, traditional, and let's face it cool system be replaced by something that in practice works no differently, but reeks of Blair's America-love. I actually find it quite sad to see the end of the House of Lords as the final court of appeal; it's like a part of Britain has been killed off along with the tradition for the sake of modern symbolism.
__________________
Veni Vidi Defeci Opera, just what the world needs, more fat women screaming. "Last year they pitched camp at the base of Mount Everest and had their servants climb up it while they held a wine tasting."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
Member
|
Our supreme court > your supreme court.
![]() Look at how festive they are in their Santa getups! (also, red carpets). Seriously though, if your Court is being run the way ours is, then it's a good step that has been taken.
__________________
INTERNETZ IZ SRS BIZNESS Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: January 2nd, 2005
Location: Leeds
Age: 20
Male
|
I'm still in a state of apoplexy at the carpets.
__________________
Quote:
LEEDS UNITED ♥ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Member
|
I don't know, I rather fancy the carpets. Think there's any remnants? I'd like to redo my bedroom.
__________________
INTERNETZ IZ SRS BIZNESS Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: October 27th, 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Segmentum Solar
Male
My Diary: (
|
I really want to know why they bothered changing a system that was originally confusing, but has been in use for hundreds of years (so people have gotten used to it) into something a bit more straightforward but introducing a whole new court and changing things etc. For one, it's more stuff to add to either my Law course or gov. pol. course (or both) when it's all already been planned out and allocated and because we know shit all about it, the next generation of law-related people won't have a clue, instead of coming out with some sort of idea about the past way it was.
I say it was unnecessary, a waste of money, and really rather pointless and confusing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Birthday
![]() |
Quote:
I can assure you anyone who under go significant legal studies will not have any issues with catching up with such a minor point. Tradition is the biggest load of bollocks of an excuse to prevent progress that has ever existed.
__________________
"Who the hell are you?!... And where the fuck are my clothes!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Birthday
![]() |
Seriously, do you read what your type these days? there is every point in improving things for the sake of improving it.
__________________
"Who the hell are you?!... And where the fuck are my clothes!"
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Supreme Court Justice (new) | 3rd Rail | United States | 2 | May-26-2009 10:13 PM |
| England?/United Kingdom | Lamborgotti | Europe | 47 | Mar-27-2008 03:31 PM |
| Supreme court | madgeisgod | Forward | 7 | Jul-23-2007 06:06 AM |
| Supreme Court rules against the EPA in 5-4 decision | Stewie | Forward | 4 | Apr-03-2007 03:36 PM |
| United Kingdom | Da_DeViLs_ChIlD | Europe | 40 | Aug-29-2005 06:09 PM |